About

An association for the companies building veterinary technology

The VTA is a trade association for companies building and providing technology for the veterinary sector. It gives them a collective voice, and a structured way to share knowledge and collaborate.

Our mission

To advance veterinary technology that respects veterinary professionals, improves animal health outcomes and makes appropriate veterinary care more accessible.

The Veterinary Technology Association represents the companies building technology for veterinary medicine. We believe that a successful veterinary technology industry should be judged not only by commercial growth or the adoption of new products, but by its contribution to veterinary practice and animal health.

Our members develop different technologies for different purposes. Some directly influence clinical decisions. Others manage information, improve communication or support the operation of veterinary businesses. All have a role in how veterinary care is delivered.

The VTA brings companies together on issues where collaboration can benefit the wider profession. We work with veterinary professionals, practices, researchers and other organisations to promote responsible innovation and address problems that no individual supplier can solve alone.

Our mission rests on three principles.

Principle 1: Respect for veterinary professionals

Technology should work for veterinary professionals, not the other way around.

Veterinary surgeons, nurses, technicians and practice teams bring professional knowledge, experience and judgement to their work. Technology should respect that expertise and support their ability to care for patients.

This means:

Protecting clinical judgement. Technology, including AI, should support informed decisions. Clinical responsibility must remain clear, and professionals must be able to understand when and how a system influences their work.

Designing around real workflows. Suppliers should understand how veterinary teams work before deciding how a product should work. Technology that introduces unnecessary steps, duplicate records or avoidable administration is not automatically an improvement.

Giving professionals a voice. Veterinary teams should participate in product development, testing and evaluation. Their experience should help determine which problems are worth solving.

Being honest about capabilities. Suppliers should explain what their products can do, what they cannot do and the evidence supporting their claims.

Respect for veterinary professionals is demonstrated through products and conduct, not just statements of support for the profession.

Principle 2: Better animal health outcomes

The value of veterinary technology should ultimately be connected to the quality of care animals receive.

Many veterinary technologies promise greater efficiency, faster administration or improved commercial performance. These may be legitimate benefits, particularly when they free veterinary professionals to spend more time caring for patients.

But operational efficiency and clinical improvement are not the same thing.

This means:

Putting patient safety first. Technology used in diagnosis, treatment, monitoring or clinical decision-making should be evaluated according to the risks of its intended use.

Improving continuity of care. Clinical history, investigations, treatment records and other relevant information should be available to authorised professionals when needed.

Measuring meaningful outcomes. Claims about clinical benefits should be supported by evidence appropriate to the product and the claim. Where clinical outcomes cannot reasonably be measured, suppliers should be clear about what has actually been demonstrated.

Supporting veterinary research. Responsible data sharing, common standards and collaboration between technology companies and researchers can improve veterinary knowledge and care.

Not every product will directly improve a clinical outcome. But the industry should understand how its products affect patient care, including where the effects are indirect.

Principle 3: Better access to appropriate veterinary care

Technology should help animals receive the care they need, when they need it, from suitably qualified professionals.

Access is not simply a matter of making appointments easier to book. Animal owners need reliable information, clear communication and the ability to make informed decisions about their animals' care.

This means:

Making veterinary services easier to understand. Owners should be able to find suitable services and understand the options available to them.

Supporting informed decisions. Clear information about treatment, costs, referrals and follow-up helps animal owners make decisions with their veterinary teams.

Reducing unnecessary barriers. Better communication, scheduling, record exchange and administrative systems can reduce friction for practices and their clients.

Connecting care. Referrals, transfers and ongoing treatment should not be made unnecessarily difficult by incompatible systems or inaccessible information.

Maintaining appropriate clinical standards. Easier access must not become a justification for unsuitable treatment, misleading advice or bypassing professional responsibility.

Technology cannot solve every problem affecting access to veterinary care. But it can remove barriers, improve communication and help professionals use their available capacity effectively.

Better tools for veterinary professionals. Better outcomes for animals. Better access to care.

These principles guide the issues the VTA brings forward for discussion, the standards it considers and the positions it develops with members.

Explore our agenda →

Knowledge and collaboration

Just as importantly, we create the forums where members talk to each other. Competing companies still share the same integration headaches, the same evidence expectations and the same hiring problems. Working groups will be shaped by member priorities and the work required to advance the VTA's agenda.

Open to the wider industry

Practices, practice groups, universities, laboratories, insurers, established suppliers, investors and advisers take part through the practice, academic and partner categories. They can contribute expertise to shared industry issues, while the association's core constituency remains the companies building veterinary technology.

Principles

How we work

Four commitments that shape every position we take.

Member-Led

Members can help develop proposals and contribute expertise to the association's agenda.

Evidence First

We argue from data and clinical evidence, not marketing claims.

Vendor Neutral

No member's commercial interest sets association policy.

Animal Welfare

Technology has to make care better, not just cheaper.

Founding Stage

A Conversation About Why The VTA Exists

Ahead of launch, our Founding Chairman was asked directly what the VTA is for, whether it has a plan, and whose interests it serves. We are publishing that conversation in full, with the other participant's permission. It is anonymised at their request, and lightly tidied for readability, but the words are otherwise theirs.

Veterinary Professional
Hi Eddie, looks like you're creating a whole lot of initiatives to tackle current issues. How is that going? What's the plan?
Eddie Holmes
What a great couple of questions. Not sure how to answer them!
Veterinary Professional
Sorry, I didn't mean to sound flippant. Genuinely keen to know how VetsCompared and the Veterinary Technology Association will address the issues with AI and comparing vet practices offering fair care. I've been talking with regulators and others and know this is an area that needs addressing, so I'm just curious if you have a plan or are just on the bandwagon. Sorry, that's brutally honest, but that's where I'm going with my question. I'm very much heart on my sleeve, I hope you'll forgive me!
Eddie Holmes
There's a bandwagon?! If I'd known that I'd have jumped on it. Would have been much easier!
Veterinary Professional
I'm just very direct. Sorry. The Veterinary Technology Association: when did that start? Who is involved and what are the aims?
Eddie Holmes
Last week. Just me. I've done this before, I started www.ukproptech.com. It's a great vehicle for new entrants to get a seat at the table.
Lots of conversations going on but nothing confirmed yet. I'm as transparent as you are direct.
The aims are all set out on the site, but the UK Proptech Association is the key: it is now part of all government and industry groups on shaping policy and the future. You should consider getting involved.
Veterinary Professional
The only reason I'm interested: I've been proposing transformation to the medicines regulator since 2019 and they have been utterly useless, but for vet tech as a whole, as none of it is regulated. So I'm just curious if you've got something. My issue is I don't want to launch if it's not right.
Eddie Holmes
Yes, you might as well not waste your breath.
I pitched the UK Proptech Association to the British Property Federation before I started it. In the end they acquired the whole thing.
Change only happens when people make it happen, not when we wait for incumbents to make it happen. The regulator doesn't even have an API. Absurd.
Veterinary Professional
Seriously, they were utterly pathetic.
Eddie Holmes
Yes, you will have to do it. Then they will adopt it.
Veterinary Professional
The regulator is in the dark ages.
Eddie Holmes
I love the challenge of building product for a user that can't speak or give feedback in any way.
Veterinary Professional
I'm sorry if my message was rude. I appreciate people who DO and don't say we could.
Eddie Holmes
It wasn't rude. You can see in my background that I DO.
Veterinary Professional
I also love a challenge, but vet tech is a terrible abomination of lack of regulation and standards. That covers more than AI, which is what probably triggered me about the Veterinary Technology Association. Every single bit of kit that is used in vet practice that isn't medicinal is vet tech. That's what I've been trying to highlight, and none of it is regulated.
Eddie Holmes
www.vetdatastandards.com
Veterinary Professional
I have a database of products not covered by regs and a way to categorise them to give them a safety, responsibility and reliability score, but they won't entertain it.
Eddie Holmes
That sounds great. I love that you've done that.
Veterinary Professional
I just don't know how to make it 'a thing'. You might be the right person if you forgive my directness! Data and categorising things is my thing. Selling that isn't.
Eddie Holmes
Well, yes, this is perfect VTA territory. That's why I made it. It's a good thing, and cause-driven people need a vehicle.
Veterinary Professional
So let's chat.
Eddie Holmes
We are!
Veterinary Professional
I don't want a new monster to manage, just to make people more responsible and tech more transparent!
Eddie Holmes
A trade association is for its members. When it's up and running I'll stand down, transfer it to a not-for-profit and let members run it for their benefit.
Veterinary Professional
Thanks for your replies and not being put off by my messages.
Eddie Holmes
You're grand!
Veterinary Professional
I'm really just in it for the creatures! They deserve the regulatory rigour that humans get. Maybe not quite as much, but some of it!
Eddie Holmes
That's what I love about building product for vets. Those wee creatures can't speak for themselves. To be fair, that's really at the heart of why vets are so nice to work with.
Veterinary Professional
And it's a fresh palette. If you can be there from the start, do it right. If I can help, I'm here for you. Make-it-happen people are what we need.
Eddie Holmes
I appreciate that. But it's not for me to tell you how you can help with something like the VTA. It's for you and others to tell me what change you want to make, then we make that happen.
Veterinary Professional
Good one! But that was my question: do you have a plan? I'm just being cheeky now!
Eddie Holmes
With the VTA?
Veterinary Professional
Yes. But it looks like it's just for AI and digital? That was my issue, as the rest of the industry needs addressing too.
Eddie Holmes
My plan is to make the VTA happen and give it to the people who know more than me and who can make a real plan to make things better for vet tech, and therefore vets, and therefore animals.
Veterinary Professional
Sure, but is that just for digital?
Eddie Holmes
It's for vet tech. It's not for me to decide what that definition means. There aren't many things that don't have some kind of tech or digital element now.
Veterinary Professional
My issue is that there is no definition of a veterinary medical device, so anything used on animals that is non-medicinal falls into that category. But you've highlighted AI. I just think AI is the current favourite, but I know animals are dying due to devices that are transitioned from human medicine and are no longer considered medical devices once used on an animal. That's over 20,000 different devices.
Eddie Holmes
Pretty broad, I'd say.
Veterinary Professional
I can build databases to list and highlight products, but if you can create the platform then we've got something that covers both. That just says digital to me.
Eddie Holmes
But again, I am not here to be prescriptive. I'm just putting it out there so others can take it and run with it.
Veterinary Professional
That's why I asked if you're jumping on the bandwagon. Because you don't really know where this is going. You want others to direct?
Eddie Holmes
What bandwagon?
Veterinary Professional
That you launched a site but you don't know what it will do yet?
Eddie Holmes
I'm not sure I am able to explain the purpose of a trade body that I am not trying to force an agenda upon without sounding like I don't have a plan.
Veterinary Professional
Sorry, just being honest, but it's not meant as critical.
Eddie Holmes
If I decide everything that happens, it's not a trade body with member input.
Veterinary Professional
If there's no plan, no agenda, and you just launch it as a trade body, then I could have done that?
Eddie Holmes
But you didn't. You can't not do something, call out the person who did, then criticise them because the agenda doesn't fit your ideals, and then say the absence of an individual agenda is evidence of bandwagon jumping.
Veterinary Professional
And I haven't. I'm not criticising, I'm asking what the plan is. After this chat I think you're capitalising on a crisis in the industry and hoping it will go somewhere, and you actually don't know where. The motivations for that are not clear from anything you've said. Best of luck with it.
Eddie Holmes
Then you haven't been paying attention. See my previous body of work with the UK Proptech Association.
The purpose of a not-for-profit is not the agenda of one person. It's to make the agenda open to interested parties to take in that direction. I'm happy to contribute, but it's not for me to decide.
Questions of my motivation are absurd. I am a veterinary technology business owner. I want to see the industry, and my businesses, thrive. What's complicated about that?
You don't mind if I publish this transcript, do you?
Veterinary Professional
A not-for-profit can still earn you a decent income if it takes off. Good luck with it. Sorry, I'm not convinced you know why you're doing it. Go ahead!
Eddie Holmes
I am not here to convince you.
Veterinary Professional
I think publishing this transcript says more about you than it does about me. And feel free to publish that!
I was not threatening you. I was asking about what you had in mind.
Actually, I think I'll publish this transcript myself. Very insightful!
Eddie Holmes
Please do. Sadly the character limit means it's too long for that platform.

Be part of the founding cohort

Founding members shape the association's first working groups and its opening policy agenda.